[Sat Feb 25 10:17:25 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (307.5, 329.2) = 0 42 49.13 41 17 42.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 96.7 +/- 14.9 Background counts = 41.4 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008 [Sat Feb 25 10:17:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.32' [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.59" [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.843 [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 0, mean size = 7.59" [Sun Feb 26 05:57:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 05:57:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv [Sun Feb 26 05:57:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 05:57:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv [Sun Feb 26 05:57:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Feb 26 05:57:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 05:57:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv [Sun Feb 26 05:57:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 05:57:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv [Sun Feb 26 05:57:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Source 73 is offset by -3.581944 and -6.890014 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.883724 x 0.883724, not incorporating fit results [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Warning, spatial fit 68 centroid is now closest to src. 35 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Feb 26 05:58:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:57 2012] Source is confused with source 35 [Sun Feb 26 19:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Feb 26 19:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.59" [Sun Feb 26 19:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.843 [Sun Feb 26 19:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 1, mean size = 7.59" [Mon Feb 27 00:35:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg exists [Mon Feb 27 00:35:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv [Mon Feb 27 00:35:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 27 00:35:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv [Mon Feb 27 00:35:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Feb 27 00:35:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists [Mon Feb 27 00:35:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv [Mon Feb 27 00:35:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists [Mon Feb 27 00:35:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv [Mon Feb 27 00:35:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Warning, spatial fit 67 centroid is now closest to src. 74 [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Feb 27 00:36:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Feb 27 14:51:07 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26704.100891, 28590.140778, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Feb 27 14:51:07 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73_src.reg [Mon Feb 27 14:51:07 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (270, 292) - (345, 367) [Mon Feb 27 14:51:07 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26704.100891, 28590.140778, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29076.488400, 26575.173000, 417.119212, 417.119212, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27157.878000, 27038.004000, 680.987220, 390.078411, 90.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28637.404000, 26328.090000, 1774.320051, 1774.320051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25391.632400, 26573.760600, 333.640010, 333.640010, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25941.315800, 29997.095200, 395.018411, 357.134410, 1.839260, X, Y) && !ellipse(26113.476000, 26104.542000, 534.196015, 534.196015, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24325.627260, 30492.315000, 451.476813, 379.500011, 179.081000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24280.115400, 26628.503200, 361.740010, 361.740010, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26721.342651, 26476.928619, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28711.629000, 29802.901600, 384.152811, 384.152811, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28189.320000, 25814.145000, 1143.640033, 1143.640033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26683.055600, 29227.707800, 327.848809, 327.848809, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28459.780000, 25953.320000, 1663.920048, 1663.920048, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27409.486000, 25832.280000, 1356.808039, 740.471221, 127.022800, X, Y) && !ellipse(27527.064960, 28478.260600, 721.204021, 288.750408, 354.398341, X, Y) && !ellipse(25311.877869, 29634.021301, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25964.899470, 27476.501600, 268.746408, 268.746408, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29068.778000, 25385.742000, 1278.488037, 1278.488037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24640.500610, 25890.942413, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26464.211029, 28062.623627, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28556.060000, 29177.218000, 1260.168036, 1260.168036, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Feb 27 14:51:07 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73.gif [Mon Feb 27 15:40:01 2012] Mean detx,y = (2065.38, 1084.73) [Mon Feb 27 15:40:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Feb 27 15:40:21 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Feb 27 15:40:21 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Feb 27 15:40:21 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Feb 27 21:45:15 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 96 counts [Mon Feb 27 21:45:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Feb 27 22:00:54 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Feb 27 22:00:54 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Feb 27 22:00:58 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Feb 27 22:00:58 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00515, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src73.arf [Mon Feb 27 22:00:58 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Feb 27 22:00:58 2012] Updating source flux to 5.6e-14 [Mon Feb 27 22:10:31 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting