[Sat Feb 25 10:17:13 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (416.1, 323.6) = 0 42 7.20 41 17 19.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 40.8 +/- 10.2 Background counts = 22.1 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007 [Sat Feb 25 10:17:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.73' [Sat Feb 25 19:05:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Feb 25 19:05:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.79" [Sat Feb 25 19:05:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.985 [Sat Feb 25 19:05:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 10.79" [Sun Feb 26 00:05:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 00:05:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv [Sun Feb 26 00:05:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 00:05:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv [Sun Feb 26 00:05:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 26 00:05:36 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Source 73 is offset by -8.868032 and -3.352732 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.250156 x 1.250156, not incorporating fit results [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Source 73 is offset by -3.550676 and 3.423383 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.283338 x 1.283338, not incorporating fit results [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 34 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Feb 26 05:58:27 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9