[Tue May  8 11:38:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (337.9, 315.5) = 0 42 37.27 41 16 36.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 239.7 +/- 30.4
  Background counts = 119.0
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue May  8 11:38:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.12'
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.99"
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.733
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 7.99"
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:42:24 2012] Source 93 is offset by -3.290397 and -0.597892 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.893117 x 0.893117, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source 93 is offset by 2.413373 and 2.105878 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.944855 x 0.944855, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source is confused with source 90
[Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.99"
[Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.733
[Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 1, mean size = 7.99"
[Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Warning, spatial fit 77 centroid is now closest to src. 90
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 08:47:50 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(29344.843475, 27404.091400, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May 11 08:47:50 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93_src.reg
[Fri May 11 08:47:50 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (300, 278) - (375, 353)
[Fri May 11 08:47:50 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(29344.843475, 27404.091400, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29016.687164, 26780.979919, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27540.595140, 28748.590600, 465.684013, 465.684013, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28243.794861, 28007.343262, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26096.434000, 27287.024000, 1146.072033, 1146.072033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27095.300873, 27268.870758, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30069.902771, 27171.186920, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30689.913177, 27187.366669, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27710.288780, 26942.704400, 441.067213, 441.067213, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26792.909800, 26039.576200, 538.040015, 538.040015, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29346.000940, 24939.416600, 415.632812, 415.632812, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28173.392000, 25261.866000, 397.730411, 397.730411, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29082.816000, 24604.220000, 1230.488035, 1230.488035, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26778.964752, 29253.523743, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28538.988983, 28733.676971, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26673.862762, 28811.317993, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29790.049408, 27780.409943, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29753.638336, 25439.629913, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26870.905762, 24669.312988, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27563.292267, 24498.124664, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May 11 08:47:50 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93.gif
[Fri May 11 12:49:57 2012] Mean detx,y = (1266.92, -996.80) 
[Fri May 11 12:50:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri May 11 12:50:40 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri May 11 12:50:40 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri May 11 12:50:40 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat May 12 04:59:57 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat May 12 04:59:57 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat May 12 14:51:29 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat May 12 14:51:29 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0147, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src93.arf
[Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Updating source flux to 3.9e-14
[Sat May 12 15:10:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting