[Tue May 8 11:38:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (308.4, 336.8) = 0 42 48.65 41 18 9.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 165.4 +/- 21.1 Background counts = 101.2 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Tue May 8 11:38:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.87' [Tue May 8 11:46:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 11:46:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87" [Tue May 8 11:46:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.985 [Tue May 8 11:46:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 78 for pass 0, mean size = 7.87" [Wed May 9 03:34:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg exists [Wed May 9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv [Wed May 9 03:34:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg exists [Wed May 9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv [Wed May 9 03:34:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg exists [Wed May 9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv [Wed May 9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg exists [Wed May 9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv [Wed May 9 03:34:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source 80 is offset by -2.049233 and -1.630348 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.949310 x 0.948639, not incorporating fit results [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 78 centroid is now closest to src. 84 [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source is confused with source 84 [Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87" [Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.985 [Thu May 10 00:44:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 7.87" [Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists [Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv [Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv [Thu May 10 17:41:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists [Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv [Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv [Thu May 10 17:41:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Warning, spatial fit 68 centroid is now closest to src. 84 [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 11 08:46:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 11 08:47:49 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26778.964752, 29253.523743, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 11 08:47:49 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80_src.reg [Fri May 11 08:47:49 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (271, 299) - (346, 374) [Fri May 11 08:47:49 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26778.964752, 29253.523743, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29016.687164, 26780.979919, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24240.731100, 30744.536200, 417.707212, 417.707212, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25884.809296, 30312.758301, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25196.007080, 29876.194489, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28624.372200, 30057.663800, 409.476812, 409.476812, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27540.595140, 28748.590600, 465.684013, 465.684013, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28243.794861, 28007.343262, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26096.434000, 27287.024000, 1146.072033, 1146.072033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27095.300873, 27268.870758, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27710.288780, 26942.704400, 441.067213, 441.067213, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25303.944641, 26744.059082, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24249.580000, 26798.260000, 635.284018, 205.886406, 110.941000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24578.771179, 26259.439240, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28538.988983, 28733.676971, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26673.862762, 28811.317993, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25312.666412, 28487.016785, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29790.049408, 27780.409943, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24772.568000, 27839.438000, 1151.376033, 758.405622, 293.271000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29344.843475, 27404.091400, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 11 08:47:49 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80.gif [Fri May 11 12:31:24 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1702.82, -1814.98) [Fri May 11 12:31:30 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri May 11 12:32:18 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri May 11 12:32:19 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri May 11 12:32:19 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80_bgd.pi.gz [Sat May 12 04:43:30 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat May 12 04:43:30 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat May 12 14:51:29 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat May 12 14:51:29 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0118, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src80.arf [Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat May 12 14:51:35 2012] Updating source flux to 4.3e-14 [Sat May 12 15:10:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting