[Tue May  8 11:38:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (354.9, 285.1) = 0 42 30.68 41 14 24.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.2 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 113.5
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Tue May  8 11:38:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.21'
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.53"
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.578
[Tue May  8 11:46:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 8.53"
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Wed May  9 03:34:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2122.610000, observed total counts = 1048.000000
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 101
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source 101 is offset by 2.866940 and 6.754399 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.127324 x 0.984676, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 00:42:25 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9