[Tue May  8 11:38:52 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (147.5, 382.3) = 0 43 50.79 41 21 23.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.7 +/- 8.2
  Background counts = 8.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May  8 11:38:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.52'
[Wed May  9 14:14:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  9 14:14:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.69"
[Wed May  9 14:14:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.049
[Wed May  9 14:14:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 12.69"
[Thu May 10 00:41:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:41:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Thu May 10 00:41:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:41:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Thu May 10 00:41:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:41:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:41:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Thu May 10 00:41:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:41:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Thu May 10 00:41:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:43:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 77 centroid is now closest to src. 86
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 86 centroid is now closest to src. 68
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Warning: source 89 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 61 at 11.415314 pixels away
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 00:43:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9