[Tue May  8 11:38:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (394.0, 370.9) = 0 42 15.57 41 20 33.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 78.1 +/- 11.8
  Background counts = 13.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008

[Tue May  8 11:38:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.69'
[Wed May  9 03:34:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  9 03:34:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.78"
[Wed May  9 03:34:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.931
[Wed May  9 03:34:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 0, mean size = 10.78"
[Wed May  9 14:14:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 14:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Wed May  9 14:14:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 14:14:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Wed May  9 14:14:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  9 14:14:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 14:14:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  9 14:14:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 10 00:43:09 2012] Source 57 is offset by -5.567754 and 5.303248 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.304929 x 1.304929, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 192.613000, observed total counts = 186.000000
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.351591 pixels
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] 190.366800 total counts/ 139.149000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.341911
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 0.351591 pixels
  Position = (393.6, 370.8) = 0 42 15.70 41 20 33.2
  Extent = 4.9 (2.7-6.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 51.2 +/- 13.8
  Background counts = 139.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 00:43:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9