[Fri Apr  6 11:35:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (340.9, 331.8) = 0 42 35.43 41 17 40.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 102.3 +/- 20.2
  Background counts = 105.2
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Fri Apr  6 11:35:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.92'
[Fri Apr  6 11:38:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 11:38:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.39"
[Fri Apr  6 11:38:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.060
[Fri Apr  6 11:38:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 8.39"
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 90 centroid is now closest to src. 96
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Source 97 is offset by -0.463560 and -2.498533 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.336966 x 2.116843, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:37 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9