[Fri Apr 6 11:35:35 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (327.1, 334.9) = 0 42 40.74 41 17 52.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 167.0 +/- 23.3 Background counts = 113.5 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001 [Fri Apr 6 11:35:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.37' [Fri Apr 6 11:38:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Apr 6 11:38:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Fri Apr 6 11:38:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.715 [Fri Apr 6 11:38:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 8.11" [Fri Apr 6 15:40:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 15:40:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv [Fri Apr 6 15:40:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 15:40:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv [Fri Apr 6 15:40:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Apr 6 15:40:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 15:40:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv [Fri Apr 6 15:40:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 15:40:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv [Fri Apr 6 15:40:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Source 94 is offset by -2.513296 and 2.310526 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.828179 x 0.828179, not incorporating fit results [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3307.480000, observed total counts = 2750.000000 [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 24 [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Apr 6 20:26:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Apr 6 20:27:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Apr 6 20:27:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Fri Apr 6 20:27:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.715 [Fri Apr 6 20:27:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 8.11" [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Fri Apr 6 23:19:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Source 94 is offset by -4.025572 and -5.094371 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.173402 x 0.517218, not incorporating fit results [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Apr 7 03:24:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Apr 7 03:25:30 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28410.257233, 29090.929749, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Apr 7 03:25:30 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src.reg [Sat Apr 7 03:25:30 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (290, 297) - (365, 372) [Sat Apr 7 03:25:30 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28410.257233, 29090.929749, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28930.461940, 26922.650200, 1326.986438, 1326.986438, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29697.224274, 31779.784119, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30591.790620, 31219.269000, 406.348812, 406.348812, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28569.997070, 30140.420349, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26548.309082, 29523.683594, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27442.152808, 28722.972400, 742.076021, 742.076021, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28097.574432, 28212.274353, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25845.472382, 27778.007141, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30620.234589, 27321.355377, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27008.907400, 27352.190200, 501.600014, 501.600014, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27643.017400, 27031.223400, 546.408016, 387.357611, 46.781000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27544.207916, 29973.166779, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29336.448273, 29249.339417, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26566.323456, 28920.949463, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29041.360352, 28293.173096, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29106.923645, 27828.497833, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Apr 7 03:25:30 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.gif [Sat Apr 7 04:39:01 2012] Mean detx,y = (9.04, -2345.59) [Sat Apr 7 04:39:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat Apr 7 04:39:12 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat Apr 7 04:39:13 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Apr 7 04:39:13 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Apr 7 07:45:10 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat Apr 7 07:45:10 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Apr 7 13:31:45 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Apr 7 13:31:45 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Apr 7 13:31:52 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Apr 7 13:31:52 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00847, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.arf [Sat Apr 7 13:31:52 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Apr 7 13:31:52 2012] Updating source flux to 2.5e-14 [Sat Apr 7 13:51:45 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting