[Fri Apr  6 11:35:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (380.5, 457.2) = 0 42 20.06 41 26 44.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 47.1 +/- 9.8
  Background counts = 12.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Apr  6 11:35:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.96'
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.91"
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.978
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 12.91"
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:22 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93 appears to have run properly
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Source 73 is offset by 4.672288 and -0.646865 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.415402 x 1.415402, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Warning: source 93 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 73 at 17.041269 pixels away
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 20:27:03 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9