[Fri Apr  6 11:35:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (404.5, 265.6) = 0 42 10.90 41 12 47.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.5 +/- 10.5
  Background counts = 17.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Apr  6 11:35:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.05'
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.46"
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.741
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 0, mean size = 10.46"
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76 appears to have run properly
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source 91 is offset by -1.018008 and -8.998538 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.570009 x 1.570009, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Warning, spatial fit 76 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9