[Fri Apr  6 11:35:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (458.2, 276.3) = 0 41 50.20 41 13 36.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 35.4 +/- 8.8
  Background counts = 10.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Apr  6 11:35:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.69'
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.28"
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.110
[Fri Apr  6 15:40:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 0, mean size = 12.28"
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.csv
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.csv
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 18:15:08 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505720301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82 appears to have run properly
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source 89 is offset by -7.431647 and -4.076684 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.392239 x 1.392239, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 153.898000, observed total counts = 155.000000
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.440977 pixels
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] 159.435600 total counts/ 138.988000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.734418
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.440977 pixels
  Position = (457.9, 276.6) = 0 41 50.33 41 13 36.5
  Extent = 4.2 (3.1-6.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 20.4 +/- 12.6
  Background counts = 139.0
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0005
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 20:26:50 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7