[Sun May  6 01:19:57 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (414.7, 417.7) = 17 44 57.27 -28 50 20.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 554.5 +/- 38.8
  Background counts = 261.1
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May  6 01:20:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.08'
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.081
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.47"
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 16.935990 pixels away
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3512.560000, observed total counts = 3512.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.369562 pixels
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 11
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] 3507.230000 total counts/ 3507.230000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.369562 pixels
  Position = (413.4, 417.4) = 17 44 57.71 -28 50 21.9
  Extent = 3.0 (3.0-44.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 59.2
  Background counts = 3507.2
  Rate = 2e-22 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability