[Sun May 6 01:19:57 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (248.3, 425.2) = 17 45 52.35 -28 49 49.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 295.7 +/- 34.6 Background counts = 441.5 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004 [Sun May 6 01:20:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.88' [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.37" [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.774 [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 11.37" [Sun May 6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun May 6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sun May 6 14:08:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun May 6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sun May 6 14:08:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 12:13:02 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 14.059069 pixels away [Tue May 8 12:13:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 12:13:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 12:13:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 12:13:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 12:13:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.37" [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.774 [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 11.37" [Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 12 00:41:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5586.530000, observed total counts = 4837.000000 [Sat May 12 00:41:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21556.835419, 36940.436249, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src.reg [Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (211, 388) - (286, 463) [Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21556.835419, 36940.436249, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22094.642136, 37533.357391, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19480.407364, 34426.593445, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8.gif [Sat May 12 02:13:14 2012] Mean detx,y = (2707.89, 12739.09) [Sat May 12 02:13:27 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat May 12 02:14:01 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat May 12 02:14:02 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 12 02:14:02 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_bgd.pi.gz [Sun May 13 01:39:04 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun May 13 01:39:04 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue May 15 01:58:08 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue May 15 01:58:08 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 15 01:58:18 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue May 15 01:58:18 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00306, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src8.arf [Tue May 15 01:58:18 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue May 15 01:58:19 2012] Updating source flux to 2.2e-14 [Tue May 15 02:19:35 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting