[Sun May 6 01:20:13 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (247.2, 229.9) = 17 45 52.78 -29 3 57.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 515.0 +/- 42.6 Background counts = 673.3 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0007 [Sun May 6 01:20:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.20' [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.53" [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.243 [Sun May 6 01:45:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 109 for pass 0, mean size = 9.53" [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 12:13:04 2012] Source is confused with source 117 [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.53" [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.243 [Tue May 8 12:15:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 9.53" [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv [Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6970.530000, observed total counts = 6972.000000 [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 123 = 1.759374 pixels [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 97 to 94 [Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] 6979.942000 total counts/ 6844.030000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.642865 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 123 = 1.759374 pixels Position = (248.9, 229.5) = 17 45 52.21 -29 3 59.6 Extent = 7.0 (3.9-10.1)" x 4.1 (2.8-5.8)", rotation angle = 17 Source counts = 135.9 +/- 83.5 Background counts = 6844.0 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability