[Sun May  6 01:20:11 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (250.0, 247.0) = 17 45 51.85 -29 2 41.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 404.4 +/- 34.9
  Background counts = 796.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May  6 01:20:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.12'
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.99"
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.683
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 8.99"
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 97
[Tue May  8 12:13:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:13:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:13:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:13:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.99"
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.683
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 8.99"
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:04:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 10052.700000, observed total counts = 8817.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 103
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 82 centroid is now closest to src. 110
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:43:23 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21699.101181, 21440.599564, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 00:43:23 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src.reg
[Sat May 12 00:43:23 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (212, 210) - (287, 285)
[Sat May 12 00:43:23 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21699.101181, 21440.599564, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24797.492400, 24082.276200, 6979.008201, 3958.200114, 32.072000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24043.320801, 24397.984924, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23873.601600, 24627.858000, 3566.640103, 3566.640103, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19186.031620, 24202.006600, 591.142417, 591.142417, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21218.230240, 24152.800934, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20589.855164, 23733.401886, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22525.164429, 22755.618317, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23912.167664, 22484.462830, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22615.246918, 22049.417694, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19675.408000, 21088.128000, 1886.216054, 1886.216054, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20413.798843, 21842.709061, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24221.279449, 21528.924423, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19595.260000, 21236.260000, 925.392027, 925.392027, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20869.849243, 20664.709732, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22387.225037, 21094.485962, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24441.495544, 20753.081055, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23108.360199, 20682.396210, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21384.445694, 20492.760742, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20024.917200, 20540.898000, 810.272023, 810.272023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21944.636963, 20281.569092, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24404.107422, 19977.935959, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20282.004517, 19964.707275, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22260.221710, 18781.474884, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22869.901398, 18700.134079, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23769.244781, 18773.464661, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 00:43:23 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103.gif
[Sat May 12 06:32:35 2012] Mean detx,y = (3398.39, -2810.58) 
[Sat May 12 06:32:43 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May 12 06:33:26 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May 12 06:33:26 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May 12 06:33:26 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 13 05:04:11 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May 13 05:04:11 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue May 15 01:58:14 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue May 15 01:58:14 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 15 01:58:23 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue May 15 01:58:23 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00419, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103.arf
[Tue May 15 01:58:23 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue May 15 01:58:23 2012] Getting flux using calc_pl_flux failed
[Tue May 15 02:19:35 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting