[Sun May  6 01:19:57 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (365.2, 413.6) = 17 45 13.67 -28 50 39.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 171.8 +/- 26.8
  Background counts = 298.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 01:20:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.65'
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.25"
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.944
[Sun May  6 01:45:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 11.25"
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun May  6 14:08:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 15.059944 pixels away
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2183.360000, observed total counts = 1864.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:02 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 10
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:13:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.25"
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.944
[Tue May  8 12:15:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 11.25"
[Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Thu May 10 00:03:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Thu May 10 00:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 00:41:15 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 12.054638 pixels away
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:41:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31723.208099, 35933.959778, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src.reg
[Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (328, 376) - (403, 451)
[Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31723.208099, 35933.959778, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 00:43:14 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.gif
[Sat May 12 02:15:31 2012] Mean detx,y = (-7161.44, 11265.73) 
[Sat May 12 02:15:39 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May 12 02:16:49 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May 12 02:16:49 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May 12 02:16:49 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 13 01:40:00 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May 13 01:40:00 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue May 15 01:58:08 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue May 15 01:58:08 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 15 01:58:19 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue May 15 01:58:19 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00178, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.arf
[Tue May 15 01:58:19 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue May 15 01:58:19 2012] Updating source flux to 1.1e-14
[Tue May 15 02:19:35 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting