[Sun May  6 01:20:47 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (355.3, 308.2) = 17 45 16.91 -28 58 14.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 113.3 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 170.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 01:20:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.19'
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52"
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.034
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 8.52"
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Warning: source 91 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 88 at 11.053802 pixels away
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.52"
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.034
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 8.52"
[Sat May 12 00:40:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 00:40:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Warning: source 79 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 88 at 16.405492 pixels away
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0