[Sun May  6 01:20:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.0, 397.0) = 17 45 38.89 -28 51 52.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 85.1 +/- 18.7
  Background counts = 134.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 01:20:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.18'
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02"
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.145
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 10.02"
[Tue May  8 12:12:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Warning: source 99 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 13.736885 pixels away
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9