[Sun May  6 01:20:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (349.4, 201.2) = 17 45 18.87 -29 6 3.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.3 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 125.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May  6 01:20:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.96'
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.41"
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.076
[Mon May  7 05:17:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 10.41"
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 12:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Tue May  8 12:12:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 12:14:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 71 centroid is now closest to src. 119
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:14:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.41"
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.076
[Fri May 11 06:42:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 10.41"
[Sat May 12 00:40:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 00:40:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 00:40:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 00:40:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1738.180000, observed total counts = 1481.000000
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 120
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:42:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9