[Sun May  6 01:20:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.1, 300.1) = 17 46 1.06 -28 58 52.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 184.2 +/- 26.2
  Background counts = 312.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 01:20:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.53'
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.19"
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.915
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 0, mean size = 9.19"
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 12:13:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3190.250000, observed total counts = 2906.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:53 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 0.164812 pixels
[Tue May  8 12:13:53 2012] 3194.733000 total counts/ 3074.830000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.162318
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 0.164812 pixels
  Position = (222.0, 300.1) = 17 46 1.12 -28 58 52.4
  Extent = 5.0 (3.3-7.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 119.9 +/- 56.5
  Background counts = 3074.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0006
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source is confused with source 86
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.04"
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.453
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 5.04"
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3186.960000, observed total counts = 2906.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 0.017365 pixels
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] 3197.393000 total counts/ 3082.300000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.073058
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 93 = 0.017365 pixels
  Position = (222.0, 300.1) = 17 46 1.12 -28 58 52.4
  Extent = 4.9 (3.3-7.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 115.1 +/- 56.5
  Background counts = 3082.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0006
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9