[Sun May  6 01:20:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (242.8, 340.2) = 17 45 54.22 -28 55 55.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 195.6 +/- 24.9
  Background counts = 264.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May  6 01:20:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.05'
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.95"
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.917
[Sun May  6 14:08:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 8.95"
[Mon May  7 05:17:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54 appears to have run properly
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Mon May  7 05:17:42 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 12:13:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2388.000000, observed total counts = 2138.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:52 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 69
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 12:13:52 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 12:13:54 2012] Source is confused with source 32
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.95"
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.917
[Thu May 10 00:04:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 8.95"
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:16 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49 appears to have run properly
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 11 06:42:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505670101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Warning: source 31 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 69 at 19.812175 pixels away
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3016.190000, observed total counts = 3119.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.111557 pixels
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] 2844.380000 total counts/ 2738.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.026599
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.111557 pixels
  Position = (242.9, 340.1) = 17 45 54.19 -28 55 58.3
  Extent = 4.5 (3.0-8.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 106.0 +/- 53.3
  Background counts = 2738.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 00:41:54 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9