[Sun Apr 29 04:14:09 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (304.5, 302.4) = 23 31 29.44 -54 14 57.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 36.7 +/- 8.7 Background counts = 12.0 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009 [Sun Apr 29 04:14:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.52' [Sun Apr 29 04:15:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Apr 29 04:15:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.69" [Sun Apr 29 04:15:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.204 [Sun Apr 29 04:15:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 6.69" [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 04:33:05 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Source 13 is offset by -5.016408 and -6.780059 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.974515 x 0.974515, not incorporating fit results [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Apr 29 04:56:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Apr 29 04:56:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Apr 29 04:56:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.69" [Sun Apr 29 04:56:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.204 [Sun Apr 29 04:56:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 6.69" [Sun Apr 29 05:13:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 05:13:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 05:13:06 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13 appears to have run properly [Sun Apr 29 05:13:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 05:13:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Sun Apr 29 05:13:07 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505384101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly [Sun Apr 29 05:37:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 159.999000, observed total counts = 160.000000 [Sun Apr 29 05:37:14 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.632527 pixels [Sun Apr 29 05:37:14 2012] 161.293800 total counts/ 143.421000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.492403 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.632527 pixels Position = (304.4, 301.8) = 23 31 29.50 -54 14 59.3 Extent = 2.8 (1.7-4.3)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 17.9 +/- 12.7 Background counts = 143.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability