[Sun Mar 11 07:56:39 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (433.1, 175.7) = 23 35 51.70 -55 54 33.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 112.1 +/- 17.3 Background counts = 58.4 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007 [Sun Mar 11 07:56:40 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.21' [Sun Mar 11 08:54:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 11 08:54:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.03" [Sun Mar 11 08:54:15 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.002 [Sun Mar 11 08:54:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.03" [Sun Mar 11 09:36:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 09:36:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Sun Mar 11 09:36:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 09:36:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Sun Mar 11 09:36:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Mar 11 09:36:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 09:36:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 09:36:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 17.099539 pixels away [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Mar 11 09:36:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Mar 11 10:34:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 11 10:34:13 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sun Mar 11 10:34:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.03" [Sun Mar 11 10:34:13 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.002 [Sun Mar 11 10:34:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.03" [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Mar 11 11:23:54 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505381301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Sun Mar 11 11:24:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 248.342000, observed total counts = 264.000000 [Sun Mar 11 11:24:10 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.126394 pixels [Sun Mar 11 11:24:10 2012] 248.945000 total counts/ 232.015000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.111473 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.126394 pixels Position = (433.0, 175.8) = 23 35 51.74 -55 54 31.5 Extent = 4.1" x 4.1", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 16.9 +/- 15.8 Background counts = 232.0 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability