[Sun May  6 10:20:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (381.7, 251.9) = 5 25 7.66 -66 6 22.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 152.6 +/- 19.2
  Background counts = 79.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Sun May  6 10:20:42 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.92'
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.171
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 9.89"
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 22:35:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 952.497000, observed total counts = 841.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 31
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.171
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 9.89"
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 953.706000, observed total counts = 841.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 31
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9