[Sun May  6 10:20:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (401.7, 278.0) = 5 24 53.45 -66 4 30.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 192.3 +/- 20.8
  Background counts = 79.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006

[Sun May  6 10:20:42 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.63'
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.25"
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.104
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 10.25"
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.25"
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.104
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 10.25"
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1001.740000, observed total counts = 998.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.218586 pixels
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] 1002.938000 total counts/ 894.609000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.621830
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.218586 pixels
  Position = (401.6, 278.1) = 5 24 53.57 -66 4 30.0
  Extent = 4.1 (3.3-4.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 108.3 +/- 31.7
  Background counts = 894.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9