[Sun May  6 10:20:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (372.9, 315.5) = 5 25 14.18 -66 1 37.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 157.1 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 116.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 10:20:42 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.54'
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.805
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 9.20"
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2223.950000, observed total counts = 1534.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.805
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 9.20"
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2204.400000, observed total counts = 1534.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9