[Sun May  6 10:20:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (485.4, 367.9) = 5 23 54.15 -65 57 58.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 151.4 +/- 18.9
  Background counts = 63.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun May  6 10:20:42 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.46'
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.66"
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.056
[Sun May  6 10:33:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 13.66"
[Sun May  6 22:35:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sun May  6 22:35:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 977.528000, observed total counts = 881.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May  7 12:28:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.66"
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.056
[Mon May  7 12:29:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 13.66"
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May  8 00:28:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505310101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 18.115003 pixels away
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 19:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9