[Fri Jun 14 10:15:39 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (416.0, 234.9) = 18 18 54.33 -15 1 19.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 392.3 +/- 35.3
  Background counts = 301.0
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Jun 14 10:15:40 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.69'
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:28 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:28 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.27"
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:28 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.942
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:28 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 11.27"
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3005.290000, observed total counts = 2592.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3183.710000, observed total counts = 2696.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:05 2013] Source is confused with source 91
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:54 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:54 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.27"
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:54 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.942
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:54 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 11.27"
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:29 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4434.020000, observed total counts = 3998.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:29 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:29 2013] Warning: source 84 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 89 at 13.304118 pixels away
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:30 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:30 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:30 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:30 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:30 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 10:19:22 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(36146.298401, 20391.496597, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 10:19:22 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src.reg
[Fri Jun 14 10:19:22 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (379, 197) - (454, 272)
[Fri Jun 14 10:19:22 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(36146.298401, 20391.496597, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33879.018800, 20818.320000, 1642.912047, 1642.912047, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38073.254944, 19796.050522, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33984.706299, 19536.095276, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38560.092000, 19626.746200, 2009.712058, 2009.712058, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34081.086000, 18932.740000, 1779.504051, 1779.504051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34486.263473, 17859.378310, 874.464025, 874.464025, 357.246440, X, Y) && !ellipse(37856.962982, 17960.152191, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35576.226440, 17701.540390, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37162.955800, 23493.046400, 962.344028, 962.344028, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35329.406952, 23300.024109, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38103.583344, 22252.739838, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35049.808472, 21880.269760, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34617.967957, 22043.726639, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38809.706970, 20756.012207, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35706.070648, 20482.712784, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37359.620239, 20037.775009, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39183.484650, 19547.429596, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35602.431580, 19261.913055, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36804.360687, 19174.005035, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39446.804000, 18480.571400, 2097.000060, 2097.000060, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38050.756226, 18752.277527, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38700.232400, 18644.081600, 592.637617, 592.637617, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35531.526367, 18202.272278, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37840.196472, 17463.515686, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 10:19:22 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.gif
[Fri Jun 14 11:05:43 2013] Mean detx,y = (-11505.03, -3557.86) 
[Fri Jun 14 11:05:46 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Jun 14 11:06:00 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Jun 14 11:06:01 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 14 11:06:01 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Jun 15 10:09:29 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Jun 15 10:09:29 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz = 2120.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_bgd.pi.gz = 1470.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1336000.000000, 1796901.000000
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (416.0, 234.9) = 18 18 54.33 -15 1 19.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 1027.1 +/- 47.1
  Background aperture counts = 1092.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0008

[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:38 2013] Set source signif. to 1027.05/33.06 = 31.07
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:54 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:54 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0172, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.arf
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:54 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:55 2013] Updating source flux to 2.5e-13
[Sun Jun 16 10:52:29 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jun 16 10:53:08 2013] xmm0505240101/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete