[Fri Jun 14 10:15:40 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (211.0, 418.0) = 18 19 55.87 -14 48 3.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 438.9 +/- 28.2
  Background counts = 78.5
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Jun 14 10:15:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.74'
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80"
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.848
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 11.80"
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:35 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:35 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:16:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:16 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1683.770000, observed total counts = 1392.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:16 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:16 2013] Source 9 is offset by 2.626946 and -1.334785 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.356616 x 1.356616, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Source is confused with source 26
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.80"
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.848
[Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 11.80"
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1170.040000, observed total counts = 1392.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Source 9 is offset by 2.626946 and -1.334785 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.356616 x 1.356616, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 10:27:06 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(18306.750336, 36319.079742, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jun 15 10:27:06 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Sat Jun 15 10:27:06 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (173, 381) - (248, 456)
[Sat Jun 15 10:27:06 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(18306.750336, 36319.079742, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18126.605270, 36816.621613, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16965.676453, 37101.538116, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16109.745453, 36217.235474, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17166.786957, 35392.209015, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jun 15 10:27:06 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Sat Jun 15 10:32:49 2013] Mean detx,y = (-11423.38, 6878.38) 
[Sat Jun 15 10:32:50 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Jun 15 10:33:06 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Jun 15 10:33:06 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Jun 15 10:33:06 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Jun 15 11:26:43 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Jun 15 11:26:43 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz = 1067.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz = 400.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Got source and background scale factors 957752.000000, 1107125.000000
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (211.0, 418.0) = 18 19 55.87 -14 48 3.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 721.0 +/- 33.7
  Background aperture counts = 346.0
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 10:49:59 2013] Set source signif. to 720.97/18.60 = 38.76
[Sun Jun 16 10:50:16 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jun 16 10:50:16 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00964, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Sun Jun 16 10:50:16 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jun 16 10:50:17 2013] Updating source flux to 4.1e-13
[Sun Jun 16 10:51:02 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jun 16 10:51:36 2013] xmm0505240101/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete