[Fri Jun 14 10:15:42 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (183.9, 433.3) = 18 20 3.98 -14 46 55.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 82.5 +/- 17.4 Background counts = 82.2 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Fri Jun 14 10:15:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.83' [Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.84" [Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.028 [Fri Jun 14 10:16:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 0, mean size = 12.84" [Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:16:36 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 14 10:16:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:16:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:16:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:16:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:16:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 14 10:17:16 2013] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 13.373767 pixels away [Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 14 10:17:17 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.84" [Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.028 [Fri Jun 14 10:17:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 12.84" [Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv [Fri Jun 14 10:18:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 14 10:18:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:18:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 14 10:18:02 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0505240101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly [Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1133.030000, observed total counts = 1132.000000 [Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 5.580295 pixels [Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 57 to 44 [Fri Jun 14 10:18:41 2013] 1099.620019 total counts/ 1099.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 5.580295 pixels Position = (184.1, 438.9) = 18 20 3.93 -14 46 32.2 Extent = 24.8 (24.8-49.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 33.2 Background counts = 1099.6 Rate = 3e-10 +/- 0.0004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability