[Sat Apr 28 10:39:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.0, 349.9) = 17 12 32.93 -23 20 3.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 447.8 +/- 53.6
  Background counts = 1251.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Apr 28 10:39:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.75'
[Sun Apr 29 22:36:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Apr 29 22:36:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.31"
[Sun Apr 29 22:36:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.689
[Sun Apr 29 22:36:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 8.31"
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 21:31:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67 appears to have run properly
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6540.520000, observed total counts = 14240.000000
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 69
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 17290.700000, observed total counts = 17377.000000
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 1.475706 pixels
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 67 to 54
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] 17274.670000 total counts/ 15725.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 12.353694
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 1.475706 pixels
  Position = (292.4, 348.6) = 17 12 33.12 -23 20 11.0
  Extent = 16.2 (16.2-16.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1549.2 +/- 131.4
  Background counts = 15725.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.004
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14970.900000, observed total counts = 15124.000000
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 1.346614 pixels
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 54 to 67
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:34 2012] 15063.737000 total counts/ 14847.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.778745
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 1.346614 pixels
  Position = (292.0, 349.8) = 17 12 33.25 -23 20 5.4
  Extent = 7.4 (4.9-10.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 216.7 +/- 122.7
  Background counts = 14847.0
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.003
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Source is confused with source 79
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Source is confused with source 74
[Mon Apr 30 21:33:35 2012] Source is confused with source 62
[Thu May  3 00:21:29 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 00:21:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.37"
[Thu May  3 00:21:29 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.831
[Thu May  3 00:21:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 7.37"
[Thu May  3 23:17:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:17:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:17:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 23:17:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:17:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:17:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 23:19:07 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14169.300000, observed total counts = 14240.000000
[Thu May  3 23:19:07 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.707043 pixels
[Thu May  3 23:19:07 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 60 to 36
[Thu May  3 23:19:07 2012] 14188.624000 total counts/ 13919.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.281080
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.707043 pixels
  Position = (292.7, 349.6) = 17 12 33.04 -23 20 6.3
  Extent = 8.1 (5.6-10.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 269.1 +/- 119.1
  Background counts = 13919.5
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.003
[Thu May  3 23:19:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 23:19:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 23:19:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu May  3 23:19:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 23:19:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 03:52:48 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25412.390000, 30369.282000, 487.114214, 487.114214, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May  8 03:52:48 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69_src.reg
[Tue May  8 03:52:48 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (265, 322) - (321, 378)
[Tue May  8 03:52:48 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25412.390000, 30369.282000, 811.857023, 1623.714047, X, Y) && !ellipse(26826.077000, 27804.724600, 4501.608130, 4501.608130, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25841.041138, 32115.109009, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25030.396973, 29613.954590, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28448.614000, 29669.340000, 2021.744058, 2021.744058, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26532.747955, 29464.534851, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24980.118683, 31023.663635, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24772.708000, 27565.464000, 1858.448053, 1858.448053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24995.884247, 29428.606995, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25450.936000, 29073.086000, 582.429617, 582.429617, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25034.998138, 29019.875854, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26126.184000, 32085.188000, 2077.216060, 2077.216060, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26246.166748, 30132.383575, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24740.788000, 32260.322000, 2581.448074, 2581.448074, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26225.345114, 31131.647600, 1480.824043, 360.905610, 86.444000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25402.434000, 30209.676800, 1298.200037, 1298.200037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25215.044000, 26897.320000, 2256.976065, 2256.976065, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26249.127106, 32599.322632, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26244.079895, 30482.106689, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27676.558472, 31610.212708, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26745.522003, 30656.398743, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26231.922000, 31589.702000, 1441.912041, 1441.912041, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25887.161652, 30746.720184, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24419.324000, 28350.592000, 1176.680034, 1176.680034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28542.450200, 33123.142000, 1845.424053, 1845.424053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23996.542000, 29401.962200, 2021.920058, 2021.920058, -0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24463.558000, 27684.638000, 1143.824033, 1143.824033, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May  8 03:52:48 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69.gif
[Tue May  8 10:59:18 2012] Mean detx,y = (1344.33, 2835.85) 
[Tue May  8 10:59:24 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue May  8 10:59:52 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue May  8 10:59:53 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May  8 10:59:53 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed May  9 07:40:27 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed May  9 07:40:27 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May  9 07:40:37 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed May  9 07:40:37 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00756, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0505150101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src69.arf
[Wed May  9 07:40:37 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed May  9 07:40:37 2012] Updating source flux to 9.4e-14
[Wed May  9 07:51:20 2012] Flag p found in src. 69 procflags, skipping spectral fitting
[Wed May  9 07:51:20 2012] Flag c found in src. 69 procflags, skipping spectral fitting