[Thu Mar  8 22:49:26 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (322.2, 131.1) = 3 33 19.50 -36 20 11.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 113.6 +/- 24.2
  Background counts = 224.6
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Mar  8 22:49:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.25'
[Thu Mar  8 22:59:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 22:59:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.55"
[Thu Mar  8 22:59:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.850
[Thu Mar  8 22:59:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 109 for pass 0, mean size = 12.55"
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.55"
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.850
[Fri Mar  9 07:57:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 12.55"
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Fri Mar  9 16:23:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 21:28:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2453.630000, observed total counts = 2435.000000
[Fri Mar  9 21:28:27 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 111 = 1.462920 pixels
[Fri Mar  9 21:28:27 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 97 to 96
[Fri Mar  9 21:28:27 2012] 2471.492190 total counts/ 2464.390000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.143066
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 111 = 1.462920 pixels
  Position = (321.6, 129.8) = 3 33 19.71 -36 20 16.2
  Extent = 3.1" x 3.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 7.1 +/- 49.7
  Background counts = 2464.4
  Rate = 6e-05 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability