[Sun May 6 22:20:50 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (490.0, 256.9) = 3 32 19.21 -36 11 6.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 324.8 +/- 28.2 Background counts = 175.1 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0002 [Sun May 6 22:21:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.21' [Sun May 6 22:38:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 6 22:38:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.53" [Sun May 6 22:38:36 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.920 [Sun May 6 22:38:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 13.53" [Mon May 7 09:33:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists [Mon May 7 09:33:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Mon May 7 09:33:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 09:33:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Mon May 7 09:33:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 7 09:33:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Mon May 7 09:33:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv [Mon May 7 09:33:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 09:33:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv [Mon May 7 09:33:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 7 18:32:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 7 18:32:26 2012] Source is confused with source 70 [Mon May 7 18:33:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 7 18:33:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.53" [Mon May 7 18:33:43 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.920 [Mon May 7 18:33:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 13.53" [Tue May 8 05:34:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists [Tue May 8 05:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv [Tue May 8 05:34:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 05:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv [Tue May 8 05:34:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 05:34:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Tue May 8 05:34:53 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv [Tue May 8 05:34:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 05:34:53 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv [Tue May 8 05:34:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 14:20:38 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Tue May 8 14:20:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1121.060000, observed total counts = 1118.000000 [Tue May 8 14:20:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.659950 pixels [Tue May 8 14:20:39 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 16 to 60 [Tue May 8 14:20:39 2012] 1022.416300 total counts/ 990.885000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.001683 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.659950 pixels Position = (490.0, 257.6) = 3 32 19.21 -36 11 3.0 Extent = 3.3" x 3.3", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 31.5 +/- 32.0 Background counts = 990.9 Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0005 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability