[Sun May 6 22:21:25 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (272.1, 303.7) = 3 33 37.48 -36 7 53.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 347.6 +/- 43.9 Background counts = 208.8 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006 [Sun May 6 22:21:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.95' [Mon May 7 12:44:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 7 12:44:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40" [Mon May 7 12:44:01 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.516 [Mon May 7 12:44:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 7.40" [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10 appears to have run properly [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Mon May 7 18:31:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 7 18:33:00 2012] Source 28 is offset by 4.897522 and -2.751461 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.430147 x 4.896920, not incorporating fit results [Mon May 7 18:33:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 7 18:33:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 7 18:33:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 7 18:33:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 7 18:33:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 08:47:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 08:47:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40" [Tue May 8 08:47:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.516 [Tue May 8 08:47:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 7.40" [Tue May 8 14:19:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Tue May 8 14:19:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Tue May 8 14:19:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 14:19:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Tue May 8 14:19:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 14:19:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Tue May 8 14:19:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue May 8 14:19:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 14:19:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue May 8 14:19:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 26 [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 8 14:21:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 9 03:48:56 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23626.818390, 26375.880859, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed May 9 03:48:56 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src.reg [Wed May 9 03:48:56 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (235, 266) - (310, 341) [Wed May 9 03:48:56 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23626.818390, 26375.880859, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23909.899255, 25484.337101, 1954.149314, 1820.206067, 77.510184, X, Y) && !ellipse(24344.416000, 24076.361800, 362.793610, 362.793610, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23141.717987, 25888.021881, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24946.086517, 27685.566986, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25120.824400, 25817.394000, 390.128011, 328.408809, 241.371354, X, Y) && !ellipse(22586.570000, 26474.190000, 464.839213, 464.839213, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24897.425140, 24756.947540, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24928.340302, 27220.294342, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25214.016144, 25369.417664, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22352.271576, 25797.708405, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25558.904449, 26040.476318, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23224.552246, 23561.671936, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed May 9 03:48:56 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28.gif [Wed May 9 04:15:09 2012] Mean detx,y = (-531.54, -186.31) [Wed May 9 04:15:12 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed May 9 04:15:33 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed May 9 04:15:35 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed May 9 04:15:35 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_bgd.pi.gz [Wed May 9 05:40:24 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed May 9 05:40:24 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed May 9 07:37:36 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed May 9 07:37:37 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed May 9 07:37:41 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed May 9 07:37:41 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00472, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0505140201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28.arf [Wed May 9 07:37:41 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed May 9 07:37:41 2012] Updating source flux to 5.4e-14 [Wed May 9 07:46:56 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting