[Thu May  3 13:40:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (324.8, 147.9) = 20 32 58.17 41 9 0.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 304.4 +/- 26.9
  Background counts = 149.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0009

[Thu May  3 13:40:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.08'
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.97"
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.615
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 11.97"
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 14:41:20 2012] Source 92 is offset by 4.354300 and -5.559839 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.318791 x 1.318791, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1062.580000, observed total counts = 926.000000
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 103
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source 92 is offset by -7.070827 and 2.764598 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.453154 x 1.453154, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.97"
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.615
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 11.97"
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Source 92 is offset by -1.527056 and -1.186184 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.400474 x 1.400474, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1428.220000, observed total counts = 1205.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1277.950000, observed total counts = 1146.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28209.444092, 12817.914017, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src.reg
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (287, 110) - (362, 185)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28209.444092, 12817.914017, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27566.029602, 10582.560555, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27429.781464, 10073.504486, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28785.779266, 14152.826904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32143.518000, 13791.537600, 1962.128056, 645.596019, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30918.813873, 14032.008469, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30357.076050, 13979.619431, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29267.470612, 13602.033112, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28731.090973, 13264.103638, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30131.998000, 11952.260000, 910.920026, 910.920026, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29828.940000, 11866.414000, 1063.576031, 1063.576031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30207.146545, 10741.916740, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27408.482819, 11174.092453, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30638.312683, 10906.809326, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28829.443878, 11072.396202, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28126.705414, 10028.993584, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30148.481018, 10040.003990, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29777.905304, 10397.843529, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28323.276000, 9629.468000, 1100.608032, 1100.608032, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.gif
[Sun May  6 23:27:43 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6409.35, -10694.14) 
[Sun May  6 23:27:48 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May  6 23:28:20 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May  6 23:28:22 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 23:28:22 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 04:10:02 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon May  7 04:10:02 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon May  7 15:15:34 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon May  7 15:15:34 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0103, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.arf
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Updating source flux to 6.8e-14
[Mon May  7 15:32:00 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting