[Thu May  3 13:40:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (330.8, 153.0) = 20 32 55.86 41 9 25.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 344.6 +/- 29.2
  Background counts = 158.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Thu May  3 13:40:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.80'
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.83"
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.868
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 11.83"
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Warning, spatial fit 85 centroid is now closest to src. 92
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source is confused with source 88
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.83"
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.868
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 11.83"
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 20:35:32 2012] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 92
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2044.000000, observed total counts = 1559.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 90
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28731.090973, 13264.103638, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src.reg
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (293, 116) - (368, 191)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28731.090973, 13264.103638, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27566.029602, 10582.560555, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28785.779266, 14152.826904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32143.518000, 13791.537600, 1962.128056, 645.596019, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30918.813873, 14032.008469, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30357.076050, 13979.619431, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29267.470612, 13602.033112, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28209.444092, 12817.914017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31133.156400, 11734.296000, 649.399219, 649.399219, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30131.998000, 11952.260000, 910.920026, 910.920026, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31704.174194, 11585.637924, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29828.940000, 11866.414000, 1063.576031, 1063.576031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30207.146545, 10741.916740, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27408.482819, 11174.092453, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30638.312683, 10906.809326, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28829.443878, 11072.396202, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31374.531067, 10651.107437, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30963.974000, 10728.170000, 507.759215, 507.759215, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29777.905304, 10397.843529, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:06 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.gif
[Sun May  6 23:25:32 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6759.40, -10205.04) 
[Sun May  6 23:25:37 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May  6 23:26:08 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May  6 23:26:09 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 23:26:09 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 04:03:36 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon May  7 04:03:36 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon May  7 15:15:34 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon May  7 15:15:34 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0116, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.arf
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon May  7 15:15:47 2012] Updating source flux to 6.9e-14
[Mon May  7 15:32:00 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting