[Thu May  3 13:40:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.6, 129.0) = 20 33 1.72 41 7 41.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 240.9 +/- 26.0
  Background counts = 143.9
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0009

[Thu May  3 13:40:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.35'
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.60"
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.607
[Thu May  3 13:49:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 12.60"
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Fri May  4 19:18:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 961.898000, observed total counts = 841.000000
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 103
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Warning, spatial fit 98 centroid is now closest to src. 114
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 14:41:21 2012] Source is confused with source 13
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.60"
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.607
[Sat May  5 14:43:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 12.60"
[Sun May  6 06:51:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun May  6 06:51:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 114
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  6 20:35:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  6 20:37:07 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(27408.482819, 11174.092453, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:07 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src.reg
[Sun May  6 20:37:07 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (278, 91) - (353, 166)
[Sun May  6 20:37:07 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(27408.482819, 11174.092453, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28466.211975, 8374.105194, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27566.029602, 10582.560555, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27429.781464, 10073.504486, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28620.033752, 8975.732178, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26795.107330, 8713.695389, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28785.779266, 14152.826904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30357.076050, 13979.619431, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29267.470612, 13602.033112, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28731.090973, 13264.103638, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28209.444092, 12817.914017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30131.998000, 11952.260000, 910.920026, 910.920026, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29828.940000, 11866.414000, 1063.576031, 1063.576031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30207.146545, 10741.916740, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28829.443878, 11072.396202, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28126.705414, 10028.993584, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30148.481018, 10040.003990, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29777.905304, 10397.843529, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28323.276000, 9629.468000, 1100.608032, 1100.608032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28002.471283, 8390.024750, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May  6 20:37:07 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103.gif
[Sun May  6 23:44:58 2012] Mean detx,y = (-5888.09, -12557.43) 
[Sun May  6 23:45:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May  6 23:45:48 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May  6 23:45:49 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 23:45:49 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 04:37:32 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon May  7 04:37:32 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon May  7 15:15:36 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon May  7 15:15:36 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon May  7 15:15:48 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon May  7 15:15:48 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00812, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0505110401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103.arf
[Mon May  7 15:15:48 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon May  7 15:15:48 2012] Getting flux using calc_pl_flux failed
[Mon May  7 15:32:00 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting