[Wed Dec 28 11:11:54 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.0, 210.6) = 15 45 26.89 48 38 19.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 77.6 +/- 14.1
  Background counts = 41.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Wed Dec 28 11:11:54 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.38'
[Wed Dec 28 11:57:39 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Dec 28 11:57:39 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.62"
[Wed Dec 28 11:57:39 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.021
[Wed Dec 28 11:57:39 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 9.62"
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:29 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 11.563844 pixels away
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Dec 28 12:10:43 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Dec 28 12:51:50 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Dec 28 12:51:50 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.62"
[Wed Dec 28 12:51:50 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.021
[Wed Dec 28 12:51:50 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 1, mean size = 9.62"
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:38 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505050701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1 appears to have run properly
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:47 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 106.627000, observed total counts = 106.000000
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:47 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.622821 pixels
[Wed Dec 28 13:01:47 2011] 108.604100 total counts/ 96.531800 bgd. counts: snr = 1.228725
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.622821 pixels
  Position = (293.4, 211.2) = 15 45 26.74 48 38 20.8
  Extent = 2.6 (2.4-5.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.1 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 96.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability