[Sun Mar 25 08:47:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.3, 289.1) = 17 45 41.02 -29 2 16.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 77.6 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 53.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sun Mar 25 08:47:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.98'
[Sun Mar 25 13:32:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 25 13:32:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.92"
[Sun Mar 25 13:32:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.686
[Sun Mar 25 13:32:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 6.92"
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:04 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504940201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Source 18 is offset by 6.649941 and 5.129515 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.363770 x 6.363770, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 25 14:50:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0