[Tue Jan 3 11:43:48 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (330.6, 122.1) = 14 46 4.67 -62 32 10.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 66.1 +/- 12.3 Background counts = 32.5 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Tue Jan 3 11:43:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.00' [Wed Jan 4 01:37:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jan 4 01:37:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.93" [Wed Jan 4 01:37:52 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.809 [Wed Jan 4 01:37:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 12.93" [Wed Jan 4 08:16:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists [Wed Jan 4 08:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Wed Jan 4 08:16:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists [Wed Jan 4 08:16:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Wed Jan 4 08:16:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jan 4 08:16:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists [Wed Jan 4 08:16:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists [Wed Jan 4 08:16:33 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91 appears to have run properly [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Warning: source 91 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 94 at 16.588812 pixels away [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jan 4 08:17:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jan 5 10:04:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jan 5 10:04:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.93" [Thu Jan 5 10:04:52 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.809 [Thu Jan 5 10:04:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 12.93" [Thu Jan 5 23:59:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists [Thu Jan 5 23:59:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists [Thu Jan 5 23:59:56 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82 appears to have run properly [Fri Jan 6 00:00:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists [Fri Jan 6 00:00:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists [Fri Jan 6 00:00:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82 appears to have run properly [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Warning: source 82 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 94 at 17.097584 pixels away [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jan 6 00:01:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9