[Mon May  7 11:52:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (273.8, 236.9) = 14 40 57.05 -62 41 56.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 22643.6 +/- 191.4
  Background counts = 1327.1
  Rate = 0.6 +/- 0.005

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.81'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.976
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.83"
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:03:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 109986.000000, observed total counts = 93034.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 29
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.976
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.83"
[Tue May 15 06:48:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes