[Mon May  7 11:52:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (185.9, 200.0) = 14 41 52.71 -62 44 36.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1575.2 +/- 73.2
  Background counts = 969.6
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.84'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.85"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.866
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 11.85"
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 16371.300000, observed total counts = 14194.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 83
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 84
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 132
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.85"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.866
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 11.85"
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes