[Mon May 7 11:52:47 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (175.8, 232.1) = 14 41 59.00 -62 42 16.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 2477.2 +/- 83.4 Background counts = 1186.2 Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.001 [Mon May 7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.11' [Mon May 7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.48" [Mon May 7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.736 [Mon May 7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 0, mean size = 11.48" [Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg exists [Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv [Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv [Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists [Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv [Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv [Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Warning: source 63 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 10.681947 pixels away [Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 70 centroid is now closest to src. 33 [Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.48" [Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.736 [Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 1, mean size = 11.48" [Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg exists [Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.csv [Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg exists [Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.csv [Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists [Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.csv [Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists [Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.csv [Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes