[Mon May  7 11:52:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (236.2, 409.1) = 14 41 20.50 -62 29 26.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 2557.6 +/- 82.3
  Background counts = 977.9
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.20'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.03"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.977
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 11.03"
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:30 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 20026.000000, observed total counts = 20011.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 3.339007 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] 19852.270000 total counts/ 12725.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 63.176464
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 3.339007 pixels
  Position = (239.3, 407.8) = 14 41 18.57 -62 29 32.8
  Extent = 22.1 (22.0-44.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 7126.8 +/- 140.9
  Background counts = 12725.5
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 25791.500000, observed total counts = 25463.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 1.963904 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 53 to 94
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] 25945.370000 total counts/ 17842.400000 bgd. counts: snr = 60.662122
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 1.963904 pixels
  Position = (237.8, 409.1) = 14 41 19.50 -62 29 27.2
  Extent = 21.4 (21.4-42.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 8103.0 +/- 161.1
  Background counts = 17842.4
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 100
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 154
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 21.41"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=4.9, npix_max = 117, mask sum = 110, frac = 0.936
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 1, mean size = 21.41"
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53 appears to have run properly