[Mon May  7 11:52:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (311.2, 420.0) = 14 40 33.44 -62 28 39.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 7632.5 +/- 124.6
  Background counts = 1184.9
  Rate = 0.2 +/- 0.003

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.86'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.86"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.002
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 0, mean size = 10.86"
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 57783.200000, observed total counts = 59167.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 41 = 3.865776 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 39 to 38
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] 51897.200000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 164.357500
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 41 = 3.865776 pixels
  Position = (309.7, 416.4) = 14 40 34.36 -62 28 55.6
  Extent = 21.1 (21.1-42.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 26297.2 +/- 227.8
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 0.4 +/- 0.003
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 40
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 46
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 21.15"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=4.9, npix_max = 114, mask sum = 121, frac = 1.052
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 1, mean size = 21.15"
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly