[Mon May  7 11:52:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (300.2, 342.0) = 14 40 40.32 -62 34 19.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 28742.2 +/- 212.9
  Background counts = 746.2
  Rate = 0.5 +/- 0.004

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.16'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.01"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.912
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.01"
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 118625.000000, observed total counts = 126926.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 3.601240 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:03:27 2012] 107841.800000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 514.011250
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 3.601240 pixels
  Position = (302.3, 345.0) = 14 40 39.04 -62 34 6.5
  Extent = 16.0 (16.0-32.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 82241.8 +/- 328.4
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 1 +/- 0.005
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 24
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 16.02"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=3.7, npix_max = 69, mask sum = 64, frac = 0.915
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 16.02"
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes