[Mon May  7 11:52:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (235.2, 208.9) = 14 41 21.46 -62 43 57.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 14671.0 +/- 154.4
  Background counts = 814.1
  Rate = 0.2 +/- 0.002

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.95'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.40"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.077
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 10.40"
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:03:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 91222.000000, observed total counts = 68236.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:03:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Source 12 is offset by 8.764028 and 1.372645 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.565048 x 12.520368, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.40"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.077
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 10.40"
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes