[Mon May  7 11:52:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.0, 410.0) = 14 41 29.46 -62 29 22.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1527.4 +/- 61.6
  Background counts = 601.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:53:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.81'
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.33"
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.908
[Mon May  7 12:38:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 11.33"
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Source 101 is offset by -0.307618 and 4.311082 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.347926 x 1.347926, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:03:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 95 centroid is now closest to src. 178
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:03:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.33"
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.908
[Sat May 12 23:06:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 1, mean size = 11.33"
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Tue May 15 06:48:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes