[Mon May  7 11:54:46 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (202.9, 235.9) = 14 41 41.89 -62 41 58.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 624.4 +/- 46.0
  Background counts = 480.0
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0006

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.28'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.57"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.049
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 106 for pass 0, mean size = 10.57"
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source 73 is offset by 5.519885 and -2.280656 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.272892 x 1.272892, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 74
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.57"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.049
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 105 for pass 1, mean size = 10.57"